New frontiers in nondiet counseling:
Empowered clients make healthier choices |
(used with permission from Healthy Weight Journal,
January/February/95)
by
Linda Omichinski, RD
The worldwide nondiet movement has given health professionals
many new issues to consider in their interactions and interventions
with clients. Society has begun to accept that diets don't work,
yet weight preoccupation exists.
It
takes courage to relinquish traditional medical models, yet considered
risk taking is a hallmark of leadership. As we counsel clients
to abandon diets and embrace healthy living, we must also provide
new signposts to guide them in their journey.
Clients
have told us that health professionals often deliver counseling
and education in language that diminishes self esteem and rekindles
the defeatist chronic dieting syndrome. We can identify with
the diet mentality both personally and professionally.
Clients
are looking for answers and direction. We can best assist them
with an empowerment approach to their health issues. We adapt
these client concerns into our program language.
Health
definitions
A
refocused definition of "health" is a starting point
for this approach. A meaningful and tangible definition has been
developed, which translates into the language of both health
professionals and clients.
For
the professional, health is defined as an independent, nondieting
lifestyle characterized by nourishing eating and activity patterns,
and self-acceptance.
For
the client, health means putting aside the scale, calorie counting
and fat gram levels. It means listening to one's body for signals
that mean "enough" and "more," and discovering
individual patterns for food and activity levels that keep you
energized. It means finding the strength to accept yourself just
as you are and get on with life.
Clients
can simultaneously be large, healthy and happy if they demonstrate
the characteristics of this definition. These new parameters
could replace weight standards and diet preoccupation in your
clinical approach.
Challenge
the comfort zone
The
first step to offering the client an empowerment approach is
to understand your new role as counselor. You are now a facilitator,
adding a new dimension to the traditional role of teacher. Expertise
and education are not abandoned, rather, knowledge and objectivity
are redirected.
It's
natural for clients to want diets from us because they want to
lose weight. We may think fulfilling this request is the best
approach - but is it? Does the client really want a diet, or
merely the sense of security that comes from a piece of paper,
telling them what to do? As dietitians, are we listening to the
client, or staying in our own comfort zones by providing an individually-prescribed
diet sheet?
Establish
trust
A
facilitator explores the client's understanding of and experience
with dieting by asking probing, open ended questions that gently
challenge personal myths and understanding. Here are the types
of questions that create this atmosphere of trust:
- Why
do you want to lose weight?
- Why
can't you accept yourself?
- How
do you feel when society tells you to look a certain way?
- Do
you have to feel this way?
- If
you don't accept yourself, what will happen?
Alma
A
recent counseling experience might further clarify this style.
I saw Alma for initial assessment about diabetes. We worked through
the nondiet nutrition concepts that would enable her to stabilize
her blood sugar. A week later she called to tell me it wasn't
working. She wanted to lose weight, and she needed a diet sheet.
Is
it appropriate now to give the client what she wanted, that is,
a diet sheet? The medical model says yes.
I
analyzed what Alma told me. Why didn't it work for her? Maybe
she wasn't a candidate for this approach? Was having a diet sheet
an attempt to control one aspect of her life?
Then
I probed further, and Alma opened up. She felt overwhelmed with
the stressors in her life. 1) Her daughter was always unloading
her problems in her life. 2) She was dependent on her husband
for transportation. 3) She had lost interest in life and was
bored frequently. 4) She took no time for herself. 5) She ate
to suppress these feelings; she ate for psychological hunger,
not just physical hunger.
Identifying
these situations enabled us to explore possibilities to break
this negative cycle. Alma became aware that she was eating for
reasons other than physical hunger. She could see that she needed
to make her own decisions about more than just what food to eat.
Be
a facilitator
Move
into the facilitative role, working with the client by exploring,
challenging assumptions and framing open ended questions. Explore
the failure of diets with the client. The key here is to elicit
acknowledgment from the client that diets don't work. Simply
telling them does not allow the client to take ownership of the
idea. Through their past dieting experiences, assist them in
coming to the conclusion themselves.
Another
important step is to jointly identify weight cycling and a history
of chronic dieting in the client's health profile. This will
impact the client's ability to lose weight with a healthier lifestyle.
However, when we focus on healthier living per se and not weight
loss, improved lifestyle for the client is the desired result.
The client's weight will stabilize, decrease, or slightly increase
depending on the genetic profile and client's history of chronic
dieting.
Transfer
power
Become
an enabler of healthy living by transferring "power"
for healthy decisions to the client.
With
the empowerment model, we assist the client in identifying what
steps they are making in the process of healthy living, not what
they are not doing. We, as facilitating agents in this process,
desire changes to be permanent. We can assist clients in reflecting
on their true lifetime goals, which yields more emotional and
physical health benefits. For example, how can clients experience
the enjoyment of increased activity? Possibly by experimenting
with different activities to find one they enjoy. We can suggest
they model others who partake in activity for the fun of it.
In
our new role as facilitators, we enable the client to explore
the options, but the final decision is up to the client. The
type of questions we can ask are:
How
can you extract the most enjoyment from your food?
The
answers you would want to draw from the client could be:
- by
paying attention
- allowing
myself to taste and savor food without guilt
- eating
regularly so I don't come to the table starved
- tuning
into the texture of foods
Clients
begin to appreciate the flavors, textures and subtle changes
in making slight shifts toward a lower fat eating pattern. The
process takes time but is enjoyable, resulting in preference
changes.
Match
language to intentions
- Do
you use words like overweight? Use the word large instead.
- Do
you focus on weight as a measure of success? Replace with the
word health.
- Are
you able to present the educational information with a health
focus? Focus on lifestyle changes, not weight loss.
- Do
you give clients the final choice?
- Extract
lifestyle experiences from your client. Using this information,
you can identify and personalize the choices available to the
client.
Here
is a helpful list to cue you further about the art of changing
language and using positive expressions of encouragement.
|
Diet
language & Nondiet language |
|
DIET LANGUAGE |
NONDIET LANGUAGE |
|
Medical Model |
Empowerment Model |
|
preach |
enable |
|
compliance |
examine |
|
control |
explore |
|
adherence |
identify |
|
should |
study |
|
must |
reflect |
|
prescribe |
enjoy |
|
best for you |
extract most enjoyment |
|
approval |
empower |
|
limit |
experience |
|
regimen |
delightful |
|
willpower |
choice |
This
comparative model sets out the medical (diet) and empowerment
(nondiet) approaches in counseling issues. The goal of each model
is to assist the client to better health, but the diet model
has built-in limitations because of a single closed goal. Notice
how the actual counseling language sends desirable and undesirable
messages. See how this works as you read how two clients, Sally
and Hazel, move through the contrasting models.
|
ISSUES |
MEDICAL MODEL (Diet) |
EMPOWERMENT MODEL (Nondiet) |
|
Expectation |
Compliance |
Self-awareness |
|
Method |
Behavior modification; control |
Personal responsibility; informed choice |
|
Result |
Daily management |
Quality of life |
|
Setback |
Failure |
Self-discovery process |
|
Effect |
Immediacy |
Gradual change |
|
Responsibility |
Health practitioners in control |
Individual in charge |
|
Information dissemination |
Filtered by health professionals' judgment on need to know |
Freely provided to facilitate choices |
|
Success |
External goals - weight loss |
Internal goals - feeling better, improved well-being |
Sally
sets new goals for health
Sally
went on a quick weight loss program and lost eighty pounds. She
eventually stopped dieting and started to gain the weight back.
Now she was at a decision point. She wanted two things - to follow
a nondiet program emphasizing healthier living; and to avoid
regaining any more weight.
Yet,
the very consequences of dieting might interfere with her desire
to stop weight gain. Change in body composition occurs with dieting
as along with fat loss, there is loss of water and muscle mass.
The effect is a lowered metabolism. So, Sally could choose to
start the vicious diet cycle again with the predictable effect
of weight gain, or she could choose a nondiet approach to health
without any focus on weight issues.
When
Sally is equipped with knowledge about how her body will react
to either choice, she is empowered to take responsibility for
her past actions and her own health. She can choose health goals
over weight loss/gain goals. The key here for the health professional
is the parameter of models for counseling.
In
the medical (diet) model, the client and health professional
view weight gain as failure, noncompliance and reason to quit.
In the empowerment model, the health professional facilitator
guides the client through self-discovery. The client concludes
that diets don't work and is empowered to focus on improved well-being,
not weight loss.
The
facilitator's role as an enabler makes Sally aware of her options.
Sally is empowered to be in charge of her own life. As an informed
client, she can make her own life choices. Results are not immediate
and external goals are no longer the endpoint. Sally studies
the process of identifying the factors that will allow her to
improve her quality of life. She discovers her own patterns for
food and activity levels that keep her energized. She learns
to let go of the constant preoccupation with food and weight.
She begins to listen to her body for signals of hunger and fullness.
The
facilitator recognizes that this process makes an impact on Sally's
life that is more likely to be longterm. Sally no longer needs
people to police her progress with daily management of her eating
or her life. Sally accepts the consequences of past dieting as
she sets new goals for her future health.
Contrast
these positive results with the experiences most health professionals
have with diet treatment. Perhaps we recommend exercise for 1/2
hour three times a week, using a prescribed exercise plan. Or
we may prescribe a specific individualized regimen or meal plan
for the individual, who attempts to follow it to seek our approval.
We retain control with this method, doing what we feel is best
for the individual. If they don't comply or adhere to the plan
with its implied limitations, its should's and shouldn'ts, we
feel we have failed, and that the client does not have enough
willpower.
This
new role for the facilitator is often uncomfortable. Traditionally,
he or she may be more familiar with the didactic approach of
telling Sally what she should do.
With
practice though, the empowerment approach is reinforced through
satisfying experiences.
Hazel untangles emotional needs
Hazel
is starting to sort out lifestyle situations that were affecting
her enjoyment of food.
She
is a 43 year old woman with arthritis. Her doctor suggested that
she decrease her weight to ease discomfort.
I
asked Hazel about her weight history. She felt that genetically
her body weight was high. Previous attempts to cut back on calories
did not result in weight loss. Hazel was 114 to 120 pounds when
she got married. Six children later, she was around 215 pounds.
I
built an expanded profile on Hazel with further discussion using
open ended questions:
- ate
under stress
- craved
sweets
- perfectionist
tendencies
- all
or nothing diet mentality
- ate
for psychological hunger
- late
automatically to suppress feelings
- felt
guilty when eating sweets
- frequently
did not taste food
- ate
more since didn't taste food due to guilt feelings
- got
too hungry before eating therefore ate quickly
- came
to table too hungry
- habit
of cleaning plate
- overate
because she likes the food
- spent
little time on self; resentment and frustration built up. Hours
spent on renovating daughter's room created a lot of frustration
for Hazel - her 18 year old leaves room messy.
Hazel
had tangled her emotional with her physical hunger needs, and
needed help to establish new patterns for energizing healthy
routines. The client with this type of profile is well-suited
to the empowerment approach to health.
If
Hazel had been put through the traditional diet with the expectation
of weight loss, only one type of result is measurable. If she
didn't lose weight, the outcome of diet/lifestyle counseling
would be failure.
|
Medical
model vs the nondiet model |
Medical Model
The Diet |
Empowerment, Facilitative Model
HUGS non-diet approach |
Expectation
compliance
Counseling Question
"Are you watching the fats in
foods?"
Message
Hazel needs to comply to a certain,
generic regime, "Food is high in fat; cut back in this area." |
Expectation
self awareness
Counseling Suggestion
"Try to notice why you are
eating. You've mentioned guilty feelings and cleaning your plate..."
Message
Hazel becomes more aware of why she is eating; feels the individualized,
caring guidance from health professional |
Method
behavior modification, control
Counseling questions
What do you do when you're frustrated? Can you go for a walk
to let off some steam?
Message
Here is a band-aid for your bad habit of eating when frustrated;
just handle it by going for a walk to get control of your feelings. |
Method
personal responsibility, informed choice
Counseling Suggestion
What do you think is causing your
frustrations; how can you prevent these situations?
Message
Hazel has choices and inner desires
that can be expressed. Issues of confrontation, acceptance of
things beyond personal control, and making time for self will
be explored jointly. |
Result
daily management
Counseling questions
Are you measuring your pasta and weighing your meat to make sure
you are eating your allotment?
Message
Each day is a controlled regime. |
Result
quality of life
Counseling suggestions
Are you continually listening to your body for your hunger signals
and other needs? This technique is your key to nurturing yourself.
Often our body is disconnected from our mind if we are not in
touch with our feelings. New ways of doing things take time.
Message
The capacity to balance your life is within your realm of choice. |
Setback Perspective
failure (gaining weight)
Counseling implication
You are not following the diet.
Message
You are a failure in my eyes. |
Setback Perspective
self-discovery process
Counseling suggestion
You can learn from setbacks. What do you think caused the weight
gain? What did you do differently?
Message
Hazel learns that setbacks are part of the growth process. |
Effect
Immediacy
Counseling statement
Let's weigh you and see how you're doing.
Message
A steady decline in weight is required. |
Effect
Gradual change
Counseling Suggestion
You ate regularly Thanksgiving
Day, enabling you to enjoy the meal without overeating. Hazel,
this is progress as you indicated that you used to starve and
binge on holidays.
Message
small steps, possibilities |
Responsibility
Health practitioner in control
Counseling Question
Are you doing what I told you to do?
Message
I know best and will advise you accordingly. |
Responsibility
Individual in charge
Counseling Suggestion
What steps will you take as a result of our discussion? What
will you be doing differently over the next month?
Message
As a health professional I trust you to do the best you can with
the knowledge you've gained from our discussions. |
Info dissemination
filtered by health professionals judgment on need to know
Counseling Implication
You don't need to know all the facts.
Message
Too much knowledge
might confuse you. |
Info dissemination
freely provided to facilitate choices
Counseling Suggestion
Options are always available. Consequences of different courses
of action can be explored. Hazel could continue to suppress her
feelings with food or she could address causes with action.
Message
You can be in charge.
You do have a choice |
Success
Weight Loss
Counseling Situation
I'll let your doctor know that you didn't lose any weight after
two months on the diet.
Message
You failed. |
Success
feeling better - improved well-being
Counseling Suggestion
You're doing more fun things and more for yourself this last
while. You don't seem as frustrated as you used to be. Tell me
about how you've handled something challenging since we last
met.
Message
I care. You can continue to balance your life and improve your
perspective and overall health. |
However,
with the empowerment model,
I sent this report back to the referring doctor:
|
"Thank
you for the consult. Hazel eats automatically when under stress
and when frustrated. She has a perfectionist type of behavior
and places high expectations on herself. The weight is somewhat
stabilized but she has increased about five pounds lately, probably
due to psychological eating.
Learning
to eat only for physical hunger is key to stabilizing weight.
Breakfast is quick, but not substantial. I'm suggesting a protein
like quark cheese to her usual toast and jam breakfast for more
holding power. Ways to minimize frustration were explored. Will
assess Hazel's progress in one month's time." |
|